Expert testimony is often a vital part of a case. However, the court must determine whether an expert’s testimony is admissible. Whether or not an expert’s testimony is admissible depends on several factors. The court’s decision is not the only factor that will affect the admissibility of expert testimony. There are many other requirements.
First, the expert must have extensive professional knowledge and skills in a particular area of the case. This knowledge must be at the same level as the jury’s experience and knowledge. This does not necessarily mean that the expert is the most knowledgeable person in the field or knows every detail of the case. Their testimony is admissible if they use relevant and accurate data and follow accepted standards of practice.
Another important consideration is the credibility of the expert’s opinion. Expert testimony based upon scientific research can be subjected to considerable scrutiny and criticism. Expert testimony can be discredited if it is not backed by the data or by underlying assumptions. Moreover, the court’s rules are more strict when it comes to evaluating the reliability of experts.
Expert witnesses must be compensated for their involvement in a case. This is especially true if the expert’s testimony could be used to settle the case. Expert testimony can be a game changer and can either make or break the case. Expert testimony can give credibility to arguments made between the parties, tie together theories and prove the ultimate issue in a case.
Expert testimony can be persuasive but the courts must exclude unreliable evidence. They have developed a process that evaluates the reliability of an expert witness and decides whether the testimony should be allowed by the jury. It will be admissible if the expert’s testimony proves reliable and useful to the trier. Advocates must be aware of the qualifications of the experts they are hiring.
Expert testimony is only available to those who have been practicing emergency medicine for at least three years before the case. In addition to this, they must have current and continuing knowledge in the area of their expertise. Experts must be able determine the cause of injury if they are asked to testify about patient injuries.
There are many factors that can be used to challenge expert testimony. For instance, a court should consider whether the testimony is scientific or technical. If the expert’s opinion is based on his or her experience, the court may ask whether the expert was qualified for the work. This question was not raised in a particular case. However, Daubert does not definitively answer the question.
The Court should not admit expert testimony based on epidemiological studies because of the unresolved questions they may raise. These studies are rarely scientific enough to prove causality. However, courts should avoid expert testimony based on animal studies.
About Bill Hartzer
Bill Hartzer is CEO of Hartzer Consulting, a Texas-based search engine optimization and online reputation management consulting company. Mr. Hartzer has been providing digital marketing and domain name, as well as SEO expert witness services for legal cases worldwide, and practicing organic SEO since 1996.
